01
Screening vs. diagnostic colonoscopy coding changes payment and patient responsibility dramatically.
02
Biopsy and intervention coding during endoscopy must match the procedure report.
03
Pathology billing depends on lab relationships and global vs. professional splits.
04
Open-access endoscopy workflows create eligibility and auth gaps if front-end checks are weak.
Procedure coding review tied to operative/endoscopy documentation.
Screening-to-diagnostic conversion handling when findings change the encounter.
Denial work on medical necessity, frequency limits, and incomplete claim data.
Charge capture checks so interventions performed are not lost in report-only workflows.
Engagement path
From specialty audit to steady paid claims
01
Specialty audit
Review recent claims, denials, and CPT patterns for your panel.
02
Edit set tuned
Scrubbing and denial playbooks aligned to your specialty reality.
03
Daily ownership
Submission, follow-up, and appeals with a named next step every time.
04
Clear reporting
Production, collections, and aging in plain language — monthly.
01
Do you coordinate with anesthesia billing groups?
We bill your GI professional services. Anesthesia entities bill separately; we align demographics and authorization notes when shared processes exist.
02
Can you reduce screening colonoscopy denials?
Many denials are diagnosis and coding construction issues. We standardize those patterns and appeal when the record supports screening intent.
03
How do you handle capsule endoscopy and advanced procedures?
High-complexity services are included when they are part of your mix, with auth and coding rules confirmed at onboarding.